News

Paying for the index, not the names - Options Brief - 26 October 2026

Posted on: Oct 27 2026

Implied correlation closed at its highest since June while dispersion sat on its median. The option market has decided this week moves as one block, and it has four sessions to be proved right.

Almost every gauge on the volatility board is high against its own three months, and the one sitting at a fresh high is the one that prices the index moving as a block.

MARKET REGIME: NEUTRAL / CHOP | VIX 19.45 | TERM STRUCTURE: CONTANGO | SKEW: ELEVATED (151.80) | FRONT-MONTH VIX FUTURES: 19.450

Today in brief

The short version. Implied correlation closed Friday at 15.00, above every reading in our store back to mid-June, while dispersion sat at 36.93, its median. Those two move against each other by construction, and this is what it looks like when the option market pays for the index rather than for the names inside it. The week ahead explains the bid: a Federal Reserve decision, third-quarter growth, the September inflation deflator and three of the index’s largest companies, all in four sessions.

Markets. The S&P 500 closed at 7,623.68, down 0.52%, and the Dow lost 1.24% while the Nasdaq 100 finished unchanged at 28,957.53. The equal-weighted index fell 0.78%, so a narrow group held the cap-weighted version up. Energy rose 2.60% and technology 0.49%; communication services, consumer discretionary, financials and industrials all fell more than a per cent. Oil carried the session, Brent settling at 116.72 on Gulf supply risk before reversing to near 114 this morning. The ten-year Treasury yield closed at 4.999% and has eased since.

Volatility curve. The cash curve held its contango, the one-day gauge gaining 10.74% to 16.81 against a flat nine-day at 18.70 and a one-year at 22.82. Oil volatility made the largest single move, up 7.87% to 60.02. The bond gauge fell 3.30% to 103.32 and vol-of-vol rose to 109.70, within a quarter of a point of its highest reading in the store.

Single names. Almost nothing happened. On an identical 524 underlyings the median implied-volatility rank moved to 47.7 from 47.1. What movement there was sat in names with events attached, not in the population.

Flow. Friday’s ten reports gave no readable direction. The one line with a clear side was index put protection bought ahead of this week.

This week’s range. The option market prices 137.05 points, 1.80%, for the S&P 500 into Friday’s expiry, about 15% wider than the band priced a week ago. The week has not opened, so none of it has been used.

Earnings and catalysts. The spread between what is priced and what each name has done runs from 1.5x at Novartis to 0.4x at Apple. Today brings the German IFO survey and two second-tier US activity readings. The Federal Reserve, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and the Bank of Canada all decide on Wednesday, the European Central Bank on Thursday and the Bank of Japan on Friday.

What it adds up to. Today’s expiry prices 0.78% and Friday’s 1.78%. Friday’s is the one that matters: the first contract in three weeks whose window contains a Federal Reserve decision. In our view the correlation reading may say more about how the market expects that week to be paid for than the level of the VIX does.

That is the whole brief in one read. The sections below hold the detail behind each paragraph, with the charts, the full set of readings and the sources, for when you want to go deeper on one part.

Headline driver

Oil set the tone and the Federal Reserve set the clock. Attacks on Saudi infrastructure continued through the weekend and Riyadh’s main airport reopened after a two-week shutdown, while the US administration signalled it was close to deciding whether to strike Iran or pursue a deal. Brent settled at 116.72 on Friday, its highest in six months, and the oil volatility gauge rose 7.87% to 60.02.

Equities took the inflation implication rather than the geopolitics. The S&P 500 fell 0.52% and the Dow 1.24%, with ExxonMobil up 2.8% against American Express down 3.7%. The semiconductor index recovered 0.4% after Thursday’s selloff.

By Monday morning the oil move had partly reversed, Brent trading near 114 on hopes of de-escalation. What has not reversed is the calendar: five central banks and three of the index’s largest constituents report inside the next four sessions.

Market snapshot

  • US (Friday 23 October close): S&P 500 7,623.68, down 0.52%. Nasdaq 100 28,957.53, unchanged. Dow Jones Industrial Average 52,220.21, down 1.24%. The equal-weighted S&P 500 fell 0.78%. Energy rose 2.60%, software 1.72% and semiconductors 0.74%, while communication services fell 1.78%, consumer discretionary 1.66% and financials 1.32%.
  • Europe: the Stoxx 600 eased 0.31% to 635.78, the DAX 0.75% to 25,181.65 and the CAC 40 0.36%. Kering fell 16.6% on weak Gucci sales, Volvo Cars 24.2% and Safran 10%, while L’Oreal rose 5.6%.
  • Asia (Monday morning): the Nikkei 225 closed 0.8% lower and the Kospi fell 0.87% to 5,502.17, while the Hang Seng held near flat at 23,193.94 and the CSI 300 eased 0.54%.
  • Commodities and rates: Brent settled at 116.72 and WTI near 103, both reversing lower this morning. Gold holds above 4,000 after a weekly fall of more than 4%, its largest since June, with the gold fund down 0.65% on Friday. The ten-year Treasury yield closed at 4.999%, the two-year at 4.69% and the thirty-year at 5.296%, each easing this morning. Bitcoin traded near 79,400 and the largest bitcoin fund closed at 45.96.
  • Market regime: neutral and choppy, the VIX at 19.45, the cash curve in contango and SKEW elevated at 151.80.

All figures from the watchlist export taken at 05:00 CET on 26 October 2026, which carries Friday’s US closes. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Source: Saxo, Bloomberg, CBOE.

Volatility surface

 

The cash curve against the previous session, over each tenor’s 60-session range, with the one-session change across every measure on the board. Source: Saxo, Bloomberg, CBOE.

The board is high nearly everywhere. Against the 102 sessions we hold back to 15 June, the VIX at 19.45 sits in the top fifth of its range, the Nasdaq gauge at 28.30 and the bond gauge at 103.32 in the top quarter, and vol-of-vol at 109.70 within a quarter-point of its highest reading in the store. The day’s move was narrower: oil volatility rose 7.87% to 60.02 while equity gauges barely shifted.

Ratios. VIX1D/VIX reads 0.86, so a single session is priced close to a month. VIX3M/VIX holds at 1.05, the curve upward sloping. VXN/VIX eased to 1.46 from 1.51.

VIX futures. The front contract is November. It closed Friday at 19.615, a premium of 0.165 to spot, with December beneath it at 19.495, so the first two futures sit in slight backwardation while the cash curve does not. Put-call parity on the 18 November options returned a forward of 19.53 this morning, consistent across the five strikes nearest the money, so the series has not rolled and the comparison holds.

Correlation and tails. Implied correlation rose 3.02% to 15.00, above the 14.56 high set the session before and well clear of the 10.22 median. Dispersion fell 2.30% to 36.93, its median. SKEW eased to 151.80 and gold volatility rose 0.79% to 24.34.

Single-name volatility

The index measures above moved while the names inside them did not. On an identical universe of 524 underlyings, so no part of this is a composition effect, the median implied-volatility rank rose to 47.7 from 47.1. The share of names above rank 50 eased to 45.0% from 45.8% and the share below rank 20 rose to 9.5% from 8.8%. The typical name therefore sits just below the midpoint of its own year, and spent Friday staying there.

Where rank did move, an event explains it in both directions. Kering lost 33.6 points of rank after reporting, the ordinary collapse of event premium once the event has passed, on the same session its shares fell 16.6%. Linde gained 18.5 points into a report due Thursday. That pairing is the week in miniature: rank drains out of the names that have reported and builds in the ones that have not.

A note on what rank measures. A high rank says a name’s implied volatility sits far from the extremes of its own year. It does not say how many days in that year looked like today, which is what a percentile answers, and the two can disagree sharply for a name whose volatility has spent most of the year in a narrow band.

Source: Saxo.

Options flow sentiment

Based on end-of-day 23 October, yesterday’s positioning, not today’s price action.

  • Single-name flow gave no readable direction. Across the ten reports the large lines were rolls, paired packages and mid-market prints with no aggressor side, and the premium split is a structural artefact rather than a view.
  • Sector and ETF flow was unreadable on the same test, with one exception worth naming: index put protection was bought outright ahead of this week’s decisions and results, which is the only large line in the set with a confirmed side.

Where the week's range sits

 

The range the option market priced for this week around Friday 23 October’s close. The week has not opened, so no marker has moved. Straddles are at-the-money, from the Saxo chain, centred on put-call parity. Illustrative only, not a trade recommendation. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Source: Saxo, Bloomberg, CBOE.

The S&P 500 begins with 137.05 points priced around Friday’s close, 1.80%, from 7,486.63 to 7,760.73, nearest strikes 7485 and 7760. That is about 15% wider than a week ago’s 119.13.

The width has an obvious cause: this is the first weekly band in three weeks whose expiry sits after a Federal Reserve decision rather than before one. Last week’s stopped five days short of it. Friday’s pays for the decision, Thursday’s releases and three large results.

The Nasdaq 100 fund is priced for 3.06%, energy 3.43%, gold 2.40% and the bitcoin fund 3.61%. The volatility row uses the nearest listed expiry, 18 November, so it measures a month, not a week.

Options carry a high risk of rapid loss and are not suitable for every investor. Costs and charges apply and vary by account and venue; check the rates applicable to you.

Today's catalysts

  • 10:00 CET German October IFO business climate survey.
  • 13:30 CET US September Chicago Fed national activity index, before the cash open.
  • 15:30 CET US October Dallas Fed manufacturing activity, then a two-year Treasury note auction at 18:00.
  • Earnings today: Verizon, Welltower, Cadence Design Systems and Nucor.

One clock note for this week. The US has not yet left summer time while Europe did on Sunday, so the gap is five hours rather than six: the US cash session runs 14:30 to 21:00 CET until 1 November. Wednesday’s Federal Reserve decision at 19:00 CET therefore lands two hours before the close, inside the session, with the press conference at 19:30.

Earnings scorecard

 

Option-implied expected move for each report day against the stock’s average move after its last eight reports, across the twenty-one names tracked this season. Arrows show whether a move rose or eased since the previous day. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Source: Saxo, Bloomberg, CBOE.

The spread between what is priced and what each name has done runs from 1.5x to 0.4x. Novartis is richest at 3.2% into Tuesday against an eight-report average of 2.1%; Apple cheapest at 1.0% against 2.5%. Alphabet sits at 5.2% against 4.1%, Amazon at 7.1% against 6.2%, and Microsoft at 4.6% against a 7.0% history, the only one of those below what it has typically done.

Rank and the event premium answer different questions, and this board separates them. Amazon carries a rank of 71 and prices 7.1%; Apple sits at 61 and prices 1.0%. Nearly the same position in the year, seven times the move for one day. Rank describes a year; the event premium an afternoon.

Meta is the completed example: priced at 6.7%, it moved 7.0%. Next are Novartis on Tuesday, UBS, Alphabet and Microsoft on Wednesday, Amazon Thursday.

Options carry a high risk of rapid loss and are not suitable for every investor. Costs and charges apply and vary by account and venue; check the rates applicable to you.

What the market is pricing

  • Session implied range: SPX options price 59 points, 0.78%, for today’s expiry, derived from the at-the-money straddle on the Saxo chain and centred on put-call parity. No recent edition quoted this contract, so there is no like-for-like comparison to draw.
  • Event implied range: the 30 October expiry prices 136 points, 1.78%, covering Wednesday’s Federal Reserve decision, Thursday’s growth and inflation releases and three large results. Read from the same chain and method at Friday’s close, the same contract was 137.05. Five sessions remained then and five remain now, so decay accounts for none of the difference and a little volatility has come out of the week.
  • Correlation read: implied correlation at 15.00 is above every reading in our store back to 15 June, while dispersion at 36.93 sits on its median. In our view the market may be paying for the index to move as one rather than for the names to separate, which is the shape a macro week tends to take.
  • Tail risk signal: SKEW at 151.80 sits above its 144.69 median with the VIX in the top fifth of its own range. Both can be read as the cost of carrying the week rather than a view on its direction.

In our view the useful contrast this morning may be between a volatility board that is broadly elevated and a single-name surface that is not. The index is where the week is being priced, and the names inside it have largely been left alone. Options carry a high risk of rapid loss and are not suitable for every investor. Costs and charges apply and vary by account and venue; check the rates applicable to you. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Related articles/content             
Three per cent of the range one session left - Options Brief - 23 October 2026 The markdown was all in the wings - Options Brief - 22 October 2026   Market Quick Take - Big week ahead as FOMC ECB and BoJ all to meet - 26 October 2026 Market Quick Take - Chipmakers tumble and the ten-year drops below 5 - 23 October 2026
More from the author             
  • Koen Hoorelbeke's articles on Saxo
  • Follow and interact with me on X (Twitter) for more intraday content
Koen HoorelbekeInvestment and Options StrategistSaxo Bank
Topics: Options Thought Starters Investing with options Highlighted articles Listed Options Income investor – Options What are your options Learn about options Options education Getting Started with Options En hurtig tanke ESMA Products NOT Mentioned
Recovering Middle East exports fail to ease crude and diesel tightness

Posted on: Oct 15 2026

Key Points:

  • Recovering crude shipments mask persistent supply constraints: Middle East exports have rebounded sharply, but overall production and refinery activity remain disrupted. 
  • Depleted inventories and rising security risks support crude: Low onshore stocks, renewed tanker attacks and exceptionally high freight costs keep Brent above USD 100. 
  • Diesel remains the main pressure point: Reduced Middle East refinery output and product exports have left diesel above USD 200 per barrel on both sides of the Atlantic. 
  • Normalisation will take time: The IEA warns that diesel shortages could persist well into 2027, while demand destruction is increasingly becoming part of the market's balancing mechanism

Recovering shipments mask a market still under strain

Brent crude continues to trade well above USD 100 per barrel despite a sharp recovery in Middle East oil shipments over the past month. At the same time, diesel prices on both sides of the Atlantic have climbed back above USD 200 per barrel equivalent, highlighting a growing disconnect between improving crude flows and the availability of refined products.

The explanation lies in the difference between crude oil being shipped, the total amount being produced, and the ability of the global refining system to turn that crude into the fuels consumers need.

Middle East crude exports have recovered to within striking distance of pre-war levels, helped by alternative shipping routes and efforts to restore production. However, recovering exports should not be mistaken for a return to normal market conditions. Total supply, including crude delivered to domestic refineries, remains substantially below earlier levels, while production disruptions in Russia have compounded the shortage.

In other words, more crude reaching international markets does not necessarily mean more oil is being produced. Some of the recovery reflects a redistribution of available barrels, including volumes that would otherwise have supplied regional refineries.

Depleted inventories and freight costs keep Brent supported

Another reason prices have remained elevated is the steady depletion of inventories. While more oil is now being transported by sea, onshore crude stocks continue to decline, leaving the market with a reduced buffer against further disruptions.

The International Energy Agency's (IEA) October Oil Market Report highlights the scale of the drawdown, with global observed inventories falling sharply since the conflict began. This helps explain why the recovery in shipments has yet to translate into sustained downward pressure on prices.

Meanwhile, the security situation remains highly uncertain. The frequency of attacks on tankers has increased significantly in recent weeks, while renewed strikes against Saudi Arabian infrastructure have raised questions about the sustainability of recovering flows.

Oil is moving, but at considerable cost and risk. Exceptionally high tanker freight rates have become an increasingly important component of the delivered cost of crude, particularly for Asian refiners sourcing supplies from distant producers.

This has provided additional support for Brent, and especially physical Dated Brent, which enjoys a distinct geographical advantage. North Sea crude can reach European refineries over relatively short shipping distances, making it increasingly competitive against supplies transported from more distant regions at exceptionally high freight costs. This advantage strengthens demand for nearby physical barrels, helping underpin the premium of Dated Brent over Brent futures while providing broader support for the benchmark itself.

Together, depleted inventories, elevated freight costs and persistent geopolitical risks explain why crude prices have remained stubbornly high despite improving physical flows.

Diesel above USD 200 exposes the real bottleneck

The clearest evidence that the market remains far from normal is the continued strength in refined products, particularly diesel. Both US ultra-low sulphur diesel and European gasoil futures have moved back above USD 200 per barrel equivalent, reflecting a shortage that additional crude exports alone cannot resolve.

The Middle East is not just a major crude-producing region. It is also a crucial global refining hub, supplying diesel, jet fuel and other products to markets around the world. While crude shipments have recovered substantially, refined-product exports remain severely constrained.

The IEA's latest report highlights the scale of the disruption, with Middle East product exports still less than half their pre-war levels. Diesel has been particularly affected, with reduced supplies from both the Middle East and Russia leaving importing regions competing for increasingly scarce barrels.

The Dallas Federal Reserve recently highlighted another important structural problem. Over the past several years, refining capacity has increasingly shifted towards Asia and the Middle East, while Europe and North America have seen significant closures. This has left consuming regions more dependent on imported fuels and increasingly vulnerable to disruptions at major refining centres.

Unlike crude oil, which can be redirected relatively easily if shipping is available, replacing lost diesel production is more complicated. Refineries elsewhere may have limited spare capacity, while their ability to increase diesel yields depends on crude quality, refinery configuration and competing demand for other products.

The result is exceptionally strong diesel refining margins, or cracks, with prices reflecting not just expensive crude but also the scarcity of refining capacity and finished products.

President Trump's agreement to allow imports of Russian diesel may provide some additional supply, but the quantities discussed are relatively modest compared with the broader disruption. At best, the agreement may slow further price increases rather than resolve the underlying shortage.

Outlook: Demand destruction becomes part of the solution

The IEA's October report underlines the increasingly uncomfortable outlook facing consumers. Global oil demand is contracting as high energy costs weigh on economic activity, transport and industrial consumption. Yet despite this demand destruction, the agency still expects supply to remain insufficient through year-end.

For crude prices to retreat sustainably, the market needs more than recovering Middle East shipments. It needs a restoration of total production, lower transportation costs and a rebuilding of depleted inventories. For diesel, the challenge is greater, requiring a sustained recovery in refinery operations and refined-product exports.

The IEA warns that diesel tightness could persist well into 2027, suggesting that relief for transport operators, industry and consumers may be slow to arrive.

The central message is that the global oil market is no longer dealing simply with a shortage of crude. It is facing a broader disruption to the production, refining and transportation system that connects producers with consumers. Until those bottlenecks ease, recovering crude exports may offer only limited relief, leaving Brent supported and diesel at the centre of the global energy squeeze. Links: IEA's October Oil Market Report Dallas Fed: Refinery outages pumping up fuel prices more than cost of crude oil

Brent and fuel product prices - Source: Bloomberg & Saxo | Note: Past performance is not indicative of future results
2026 and 2027 world oil demand change - Source: OPEC, IEA & EIA
Annual change of global gasoil and diesel exports by country or region, September 2025-September 2026 - Source: IEA & Kpler
Related articles/content             
12 Oct 2026: Diesel shortages Why the global economy has more to fear than rising petrol prices 12 Oct 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 6 October 2026 9 Oct 2026: Commodity weekly Fuel tightness and gold demand support recovery 8 Oct 2026: Gold caught between surging bond yields and rising fiscal concerns              Daily podcasts hosted by John J Hardy can be found here
More from the author             
  • Ole S Hansen's articles on Saxo
  • For market commentary and insights - not trading advice - follow me and join the conversation on Twitter and Substack
Ole HansenHead of Commodity StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Commodities Mining Gold Silver Theme - Precious metals ETFs UKMustRead
The FX Trader: USD pushing higher ahead of US CPI .

Posted on: Oct 13 2026

USDJPY pulling above local resistance.

USD consolidation has been shallow – testing higher again.

The US dollar has done little over the past week, but a tight consolidation after its steep rally suggests the up-trend remains very much in place until proven otherwise. Even ahead of the key US macro event risk of the week, Wednesday’s September US CPI release, we have USDJPY pulling above the 200-day moving average today, a technical level that served as resistance on at least two occasions over the last two weeks, while EURUSD is pressing down well below 1.1200 again as Eurozone sovereign yield spreads still look troublesome. One key factor pressurizing the backdrop for both the US dollar higher and the euro lower is another surge in oil prices today to new local highs. Attacks on Saudi infrastructure and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz are a concern and Trump’s attempt to lower diesel prices by extracting Russian export commitments is failing to impress the market.

The US has a bank holiday today in which bond markets are closed even as equity markets are open, preventing a fuller picture of intermarket forces.

Takeaway: There are three things at work here: first, the US dollar is rising, while second, the Euro has idiosyncratic and potentially explosive fragilities linked to the risk of a fire sale of French and secondarily Eurozone peripheral debt (read: Italy). The European situation is made worse by every uptick in energy prices (don’t forget natural gas, which is back near the highs for the year and since late 2022) and any new surge in US treasury yields, which late last week offered a bit of relief. Third, the JPY would already be lower still without the overhang of the intervention threat. If Japanese officialdom decides to take a breather and retrench to much lower levels in the JPY before intervening again, volatility in JPY crosses could pick up sharply here, aggravating a potential USD rise. We look at the USDJPY chart below.

Chart focus: USDJPY USDJPY is pulling above the 200-day moving average again and key daily and weekly Ichimoku technical indicators are on tilt for a full reversal of the downtrend, a trend that was only ever inspired by official intervention in the first place. The obvious two levels to watch here are the 200-day moving average just above 158.50 and then the top of the Ichimoku cloud, which falls to below the former in the days ahead. Note that the last time around in the late September rally that the Ichimoku cloud was the more important resistance level. As well, the green lagging span indicator is set to cross above the price bars if we don’t get an immediate sell-off. As noted above, if the pair continues to bull up into the 160.00 area with no signs of official intervention, the market could get uneasy.

Source: Saxo

Weak euro

Elsewhere, the euro remains weak on still elevated sovereign yield spreads (small dip Friday, but we’re back at 141 basis points for the Germany-France 10-year yield spread, essentially matching the highest daily close all though it spiked to the high 150’s last week intraday). The weakness is not just showing up in the heavy EURUSD, but even more so over the last week in crosses with other European currencies, namely versus sterling and the Scandies. EURGBP is challenging the lows of the year and since well back into 2025, trading below 0.8450 as of this writing. A look at the chart suggests we could be opening up the range to the huge 0.8200 level, the post-2016 Brexit vote low of the range. EURSEK is in a far different place, having risen from the 10.70 area at the beginning of the Iran war to as high as 11.367 at the beginning of this month. It is possible that traders are reassessing the krona, placing less emphasis on the Riksbank’s low policy rate relative to an ECB that was more responsive to the inflation outbreak. Now the euro-specific risks are more prominent, including risks to Eurozone growth from higher energy prices, but especially those linked to Eurozone sovereign debt strains. Last week, EURSEK reversed sharply and traded below 11.18 at one point on Friday before finding support.

Looking ahead

While anticipation of the Wednesday US CPI release is high, given the FOMC’s emphasis on inflation rather than the labour market, the release may carry far less weight if oil prices are hitting new highs.

FX Board of G10 and CNH trend evolution and strength. Note: If unfamiliar with the FX board, please see a video tutorial for understanding and using the FX Board.

The US dollar is strong and the Euro is weak, finally weaker than the Swedish krona in broad terms after last week’s action saw SEK firming. Hard to believe that the JPY has any residual strength from its prior impulsive move higher, but the longer-term moving averages still have an echo of that early September surge. It wouldn’t take much of a weakening move in the JPY to turn things around quickly from here. The kiwi is really suffering in this environment as well – it may be down to neglect and general macro risk as there is no yield differential angle justifying its weakness at the moment.

Table: NEW FX Board Trend Scoreboard for individual pairs.

EURSEK will flip to the negative soon if it stays near current level or heads lower, following EURNOK into a negative trend, which did so already a week ago. USDJPY is the only JPY pair besides CNHJPY to read JPY negative here, but watching other JPY pairs as the downtrends in other JPY pairs have stalled for weeks now.

John J. HardyGlobal Head of Macro StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Forex Highlighted articles Trump Version 2 - Traders FR US Actualites et Analyses EURUSD USDJPY UKMustRead
DE 40 recovers after a sharp decline

Posted on: Sep 22 2026

The DE 40 is showing strong gains as a Double Bottom pattern forms. The current price stands at 25,631. Find out more in our analysis for 21 September 2026.

DE 40 forecast: key takeaways

  • A breakout above 25,735 would confirm the formation of a Double Bottom pattern
  • The technology sector is supporting the DE 40's rise
  • DE 40 forecast for 21 September 2026: 26,325

DE 40 fundamental analysis

The DE 40 index is rising after Friday's sharp decline. Buyers are targeting a test of the 25,735 resistance level. A breakout above this level could indicate the formation of a Double Bottom reversal pattern. The main driver of the DE 40's gains today is the technology sector, whose shares are rising amid a global rally in US technology companies and increased demand from institutional investors.

Lower oil prices are providing additional support to the index: Brent quotes have fallen below 100 USD per barrel amid expectations of diplomatic progress following Donald Trump's meetings with the leaders of Iran and China. A fourth consecutive session of falling oil prices is easing inflation concerns and improving margin expectations for major German industrial companies.

The current rise in the DE 40 is supported by several factors, but to confirm the reversal scenario, buyers need to consolidate above the 25,735 resistance level. Overall, the DE 40 outlook for today remains bullish.

DE 40 technical analysis

DE 40 quotes have consolidated above the EMA-65 line. The DE 40 forecast for today suggests a continued rise towards the 26,325 target.

Technical analysis remains in favour of buyers. The Stochastic Oscillator is rebounding from the support line and is preparing to form a bullish crossover near oversold territory. An additional signal in favour of further growth would be a confident breakout above the 25,735 resistance level and a consolidation above it. In this case, buyers would receive confirmation of the Double Bottom pattern, while quotes could break out of the descending correction channel.

At the same time, the risk of an alternative scenario remains if selling pressure intensifies. A break below the lower boundary of the reversal pattern and a consolidation below 25,155 would indicate a resumption of the downward move. In this case, the likelihood of a deeper correction would increase, putting the bullish scenario at risk.

DE 40 technical analysis for 21 September 2026

DE 40 trading scenario for today

Trading scenario (Buy Stop)

A consolidation above the 25,735 resistance level would indicate the completion of the Double Bottom reversal pattern and point to increasing bullish pressure.

  • Current price: 25,631
  • Entry level: 25,735
  • Stop loss: 25,625
  • Take profit: 26,325
  • Risk-to-reward: more than 1:5

The trade idea is valid until 8:00 AM on 26 September 2026 (server time, UTC+3).

Risk factors

The main risk to the DE 40 growth scenario is increased selling pressure, which could trigger a break below the lower boundary of the reversal pattern and a consolidation below 25,155.

Summary

The current rise in the DE 40 index towards the 25,735 resistance level is supported by a broad rally in the technology sector and a fall in Brent oil prices below 100 USD per barrel. However, to fully invalidate the bearish trend and confirm the Double Bottom reversal scenario, buyers need to consolidate firmly above resistance.

Open Account

Editors’ picks

EURUSD forecast 2026–2027: technical analysis, price levels & predictions

The EURUSD outlook for 2026 and 2027: key levels on the daily chart, three trading scenarios and the policy gap between the Fed and the ECB that drives the pair.

Gold (XAUUSD) forecast 2026: technical analysis, price levels & predictions

Where gold could trade in 2026: key levels, three trading scenarios with entry triggers and the forecasts from J.P. Morgan, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs.